Skip to main content

About your Search

20100101
20100131
Search Results 0 to 6 of about 7 (some duplicates have been removed)
now. i'm bill o'reilly. thank is for watching us. another victory for al-qaeda and that is the subject of the talking points. when you think about it, the underwear bomber kind of pathetic. a 23-year-old loon willing to give up his own life to kill innocent is a civilians and his clumsy attempt to kill people shows how downgraded al-qaeda operations are. compare that to the sophisticated attack on 9/11. however, just the attempt by al-qaeda to kill people has thrown the world into chaos. airport security is a mess,ing massive delays almost everywhere. everybody who flies is going to be punished. that is a huge victory for al-qaeda who wants to disrupt western civilization and kill as many infidels as it can. you can just imagine al-qaeda leaders in pakistan and yemen con brat lating themselves over the mess they created. this is frightening. these people can damage the entire world just by feble plot. it is easy for murderous thugs to frighten innocent people. all it takes is one mistake in a massive by gramcy and you have the underwear bomber. today, president obama met with his intel
lives up to its hype. >> ouch. well that is your last call, thanks for joining us tonight. good night from washington. speaking of -- >> the bill o'reilly factor is on. airports all over the world remain in chaos because of the underwear bomber and now anmen american muslim group says no arab profiling should take place. john stossel and ann coulter have some thoughts. >> i want to know why you gave bill after he allegedly raped a six-year-old girl. >> a massachusetts judge lets an accused child rapist out of jail and the guy is promptly charged with raping a three-year-old. is it legal as an investigating the judge. >> judge, it is cowardly not to comment on a bail decision like that. >> look what i have got. >> and what is going on south of the border in the weather areas? wait until you see this. bill schulz caution. >> bill: caution, you are about to enter the no spin zone. the factor begins right now. i'm bill o'reilly. thank is for watching us. another victory for al-qaeda and that is the subject of the talking points. when you think about it, the underwear bomber kind of pathet
" begins right now. >>> hi, i'm bill o'reilly. thanks for watching us tonight. president obama again addresses terrorism and that is the subject of this evening's talking points memo late this afternoon. president once again talked about the failure to stop the underwear bomber on christmas day. the address was supposed to contain sharp analysis, perhaps a firing or two. it did not. instead the president mostly repeated his opinion that the federal counterterrorism operation pretty much failed across the board, but no individuals will be held responsible. >> now at this stage in the review process, it appears that this incident was not the fault of a single individual or organization, but rather a systemic failure across organizations and agencies. >> can we have a moratorium on systemic failure, please? i don't want to hear it. do you want to hear it again? no one wants to hear that again. it may be true. we've heard it 5,000 times. all right. then the president we want on to state the obvious, that america is at war with al-qaeda. >> let's be clear about what this moment demands.
to use a weapon of mass destruction trying to kill 300 people. michael mukasey was the attorney general of the united states from 2007 to 2009. he joins me now. judge mukasey, welcome. >> good to be here, paul. >> you wrote this week that you don't think that abuell umar farouk abdulmutallab should have been charged in criminal court. >> the principal question is timing not where he ultimately wound up, it's secondary, but he should have been taken designated an unlawful enemy cot b bah-- combatant. or a belligerent-- >> sounds like a new yorker. >> and intent on intelligence gathering, he knew who put him on the plane and mixed up the stuff that he had in his underpants and he knew who had trained, radicalized him and so forth. he had a wealth of information weeks' never going toware about that and we're certainly not going to hair about it in a timely way and the failure to do that i think was major, major gaffe. >> paul: the argument from the administration, if he was named an enemy combatant he would have the right under a supreme court hearing to have an habesa hearing and could he
Search Results 0 to 6 of about 7 (some duplicates have been removed)